Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices

Representative Trial Hearing Orders:

• CBM2012-00001, Order – Trial Hearing, Paper 61, Apr. 8, 2013

Representative Decisions to Institute:

• IPR2012-00026 Decision to Institute, Paper 17, Dec. 21, 2012
• CBM2012-00001 Decision to Institute, Paper 36, Jan. 9, 2013
• IPR2012-00001 Decision to Institute, Paper 15, Jan. 9, 2013
• IPR2013-00034 Decision to Institute, Paper 22, Apr. 22, 2013

 Representative Scheduling Orders:

• IPR2012-00026 Scheduling Order, Paper 18, Dec. 21, 2012
• CBM2012-00001 Scheduling Order, Paper 37, Jan. 9, 2013
• IPR2012-00001 Scheduling Order, Paper 16, Jan. 9, 2013

Other Representative Orders and Decisions:

• IPR2013-00004 Order Authorizing Motion for Joinder, Paper 15, Apr. 24, 2013
• IPR2013-00010, Decision regarding Service Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), Paper 20, Jan. 30, 2013
• IPR2013-00109, Decision granting motion for joinder, Paper 15, Feb. 25, 2013
• IPR2012-00018, Decision – Real Party in Interest, Paper 12, Jan. 24, 2013
• IPR2013-00010, Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, Paper 6, Oct. 15, 2012
• CBM2012-00003, Order (Redundant Grounds), Paper 7, Oct. 25, 2012
• CBM2012-00003, Order (Denial of Grounds), Paper 8, Oct. 25, 2012
• CBM2012-00001, Decision Denying Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, Paper 21, Nov. 6, 2012
• CBM2013-00005, Decision Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, Paper 13, Nov. 26, 2012
• IPR2013-00033, Order to Stay Reexam, Paper 15, Nov. 6, 2012
• IPR2013-00028, Decision on Motion to Take Jurisdiction, Paper 8, Nov. 27, 2012
• CBM2012-00005 Order regarding Content of Motions List, Paper 31, Feb. 13, 2013
• IPR2012-00022 Decision regarding Standing to file Petition, Paper 20, Feb. 12, 2013

Representative Notices:

• CBM2012-00002, Notice of Filing Date Accorded, Paper 4, Sept. 21, 2012
• IPR2013-00033, Notice of Filing Date Accorded, Paper 14, Oct. 26, 2012
• IPR2012-00004, Notice of Defective Petition, Paper 6, Sept. 21, 2012
• IPR2012-00022, Notice of Incomplete Petition, Paper 5, Sept. 27, 2012

 Representative Settlement Related Orders:

• IPR2012-00004 Order regarding Settlement after Initiation, Paper 21, Feb. 4, 2013
• IPR2013-00078 Order regarding Pre-Institution Settlement, Paper 7, Feb. 8, 2013
• IPR2013-00078 Judgment Termination of Proceeding, Paper 11, Feb. 12, 2013

Evidentiary Decisions and Orders including Discovery:

• CBM2012-00001, Decision on Discovery Request, Paper 24, Nov. 15, 2012
• IPR2012-00001, Decision including Discussion of Discovery Standards, Paper 26, Mar. 5, 2013
• IPR2012-00026, Decision Denying Additional Discovery on Commercial Success, Paper 32, Mar. 8, 2013
• IPR2012-00001, Order to Supplement Motion to Seal, Paper 34, Mar. 14, 2013
• IPR2013-00020, Decision Dismissing Motion to Exclude Evidence, Paper 17, Mar. 5, 2013
• IPR2012-00001, Decision – Revised Motion to Seal, Paper 36, Apr. 5, 2013

Cases:

• Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Circ. 2010) (Download PDF)

• International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. (Fed. Circ. 2009) (Download PDF)

• Amado v. Microsoft Corp., 517 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

• Cooper Techs. Co. v. Dudas, No. 2008-1130, slip op. at 2-7 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2008) (Download PDF)

• Egyptian Goddess Inc. v. Swisa Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

• In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

• In re Swanson, 540 F.3d. 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Download PDF)

• Sundance, Inc. v. Demonte Fabricating LTD. (Fed. Cir. Dec. 24, 2008) (Download PDF)

• In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (Download PDF)

• KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR), US Supreme Court (2007) (Download PDF)

• Shockley v. Arcan, Inc., 248 F.3d 1349, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (Download PDF)

• Viskase Corp. v. Am. Nat’l Can Co., 261 F.3d 1316, 1328, 59 USPQ2d 1823, 1831 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (Download PDF)

• Bloom Eng’g Co. v. N. Am. Mfg. Co., 129 F.3d 1247, 1250 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Download PDF)

• In re Lonardo, 119 F.3d 960 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Download PDF)

• In re Portola Packaging, Inc., 110 F.3d 786 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (Download PDF)

• In re Recreative Technologies, 83 F.3d 1394, 1397 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (Download PDF)

• In re GPAC, 57 F.3d 1573, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (Download PDF)

• In re Freeman, 30 F.3d 1459, 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (Download PDF)

• Laitram Corp. v. NEC Corp., 952 F.2d 1357, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (Download PDF)

• Tennant Co. v. Hako Minuteman, Inc., 878 F.2d 1413, 1417 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (Download PDF)

• Ethicon v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1428, 7 USPQ2d 1152, 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (Download PDF)

• Fortel Corp. v. Phone-Mate, Inc., 825 F.2d 1577, 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (Download PDF)

• Customer Accessories, Inc. v. Jeffrey-Allan Indus., Inc., 807 F.2d 955, 962 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (Download PDF)

• In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852, 857, 225 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985)(en banc) (Download PDF)

• Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating and Packing Inc., 756 F.2d 1574,1579 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (Download PDF)

• Envtl. Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., 713 F.2d 693, 696 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (Download PDF)

Legislation:

• Senate Bill S515 Post Grant Review (“PGR”) (Download PDF)

• H.R. Rep. No. 107-120, at 2. Substantial New Question of Patentability (Download PDF)